Civil Arizona August 2010 Debate:
The Regulation and Taxation of Arizona Gaming



In 2002, the voters of Arizona gave the Arizona Indians a virtual monopoly on casino gaming by a margin of 51% to 49%. The casinos annually contribute about $100 million per year to designated programs. This referendum allows Indian tribes to have unlimited gaming in the event that gaming is authorized off the reservation. (referred to as the poison pill provision.)

Arizona racetrack operators have been offering the state an estimated $400 million per year if gaming is expanded to Arizona racetracks.

This policy discussion really asks one simple question, "Is it worth it to the state to authorize additional gaming at Arizona racetracks?"





Civil Arizona Gaming Debate Information

Citizen Involvement in Gaming Policy Discussion GroupArizona Elected Political Officials' Policy PreferencesCitizen Groups' & 2010 Political Candidates' Policy Preferences
 
Breaking News on Arizona GamingInformation Sources on Arizona GamingStakeholder Summit on Arizona Gaming


Policy Proposal #4a:
Maintain Indian Gaming Policy



Continue Limited Indian Gaming at 3.25% Contribution Rate:

Limit the number of casinos to traditional Indian Reservations and continue to operate under the terms and conditions defined by the voter approved initiative enacted in 2002.

Designed Revenues: $88 million/year
Municipalities Revenues: $12 million/year
General Fund Revenues: $0

Supporters:

The Arizona Democratic Party
Gila River Indian Community (John Kaites)
Salt River Indian Nation (Matt Salmon)
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation (Kristen Boilini)


Click for Stakeholder Presentation
to Maintain Current Compacts



Accept Federal Ruling on Tohono O’odham Glendale Casino:

Allow the Department of Interior process to determine the use of the tribal land in Glendale.

Supporters:

Ned Norris (Lobbyist: John Kelly)
City of Peoria


Click for Stakeholder Presentation
to Accept Glendale Casino

Policy Proposal #4b:
Tax Off-Reservation Gaming



Authorize Casino Gaming at Arizona Racetracks (Racinos):

Authorize casino games at Arizona racetracks and tax the gross profits at 35%. This proposal will generate an estimated $400 million per year to the state (which includes the loss of $100 million from the discontinuation of contributions from the Indians). This proposal allows for the “securitization” of $1 billion from future gaming revenues.

Supporters:

Sen. Steve Pierce, Rep. Andy Tobin
Arizona Chamber of Commerce
Turf Paradise (John Mangum)
Tucson Greyhound Park (Jack LaSota)
Arizona Horseman (Bas Aja)
Phoenix Greyhound Park (Jeff Sandquist)


Click for Stakeholder Presentation of Racinos



Authorize Limited Arizona Commercial Casinos:

Raise $1.3 billion by using the model passed by Ohio voters in 2009 that authorizes four commercial casinos to be operated in designated locations with permit holders determined through a qualification process.

Supporters:

State Representative Vic Williams
The Arizona Libertarian Party
MGM Grand, Harrah’s, Sands, Wynn, Hard Rock Entertainment


Click for Stakeholder Presentation of Commercial Casinos